Underwood Dudley, PhD in mathematics and author of "Numerology, or What Pythagoras Wrought," calls numerology "folly" and says, "...there is practically nothing wrong with mysticism...on the other hand, everything is wrong with numerology...numbers do not manage events...(numerology is) the belief that items happen mainly because numbers make them happen...(e.g., A couple of is wet and cold--if your range is 2, you tend being wet and cold)...I maintain that Pythagoras was a successful cult leader, and that is basically all that he was."
It sounds as if Dr Dudley may well believe he's contributed far more to the fields of math and science than Pythagoras. The beneficial philosopher Plato was strongly influenced by Pythagoras' doctrines, so it is doubtful Plato would have agreed with Dr Dudley. Pythagoras is known, among other things, for your hypotenuse theorem, or the Pythagorean Theorem. He's also known as the "father of number;" he established the scientific foundation for mathematics and also the philosophy of numbers.
Aside from excluding from his book virtually all valued comprehensive numerology techniques, Dr Dudley things out the superficiality of some current numerologists' methods. This might be justified simply because as well numerous published numerology books supply only a glimpse to the complex science and, or fail to put it inside very best context. However, numerology (otherwise known as range mysticism) is a type of mysticism and any person who has objectively studied the science comes to realize that events and personality traits are represented by numbers, not controlled by them.
Since his statements against numerology are so strong, 1 expects Dr Dudley to decisively invalidate the science. Yet, he fails to do this.
It's significant to note that hypothesis or theory can't be proven, it can only be invalidated. Graphology, numerology and astrology have in no way been scientifically shown to become invalid. Seasoned numerologists and astrologers consistently predict fated circumstances and accurately identify personality traits.
Although you will discover few or no documented cases of accredited researchers supporting the science of astrology or numerology, the field of graphology has been investigated by academic investigators (click and scroll down to your partial listing: [http://www.decadcorp.com/Graphology.html] ). In order for funds to be available to fund research in accredited institutions, a donor or corporation has to build a contribution. Do most benefactors indirectly or directly control and dictate what the dollars are employed for? Yes. In today's globe it is unlikely somebody or corporate donor will designate income for the numerology or astrology research; they are not areas that aid to directly cure disease or help the advertising of corporate promotional efforts.
Contrary to well-known opinion, traditional scientific theories are not unshakable. That that is discarded by the orthodox scientific community these days may incredibly well be embraced by the globe tomorrow. The history of science is full of widely held notions refuted by overlooked data. Established scientific standards and belief systems these days are always being challenged by new discoveries. Old paradigms are shattered, and exciting new platforms are established. Some of these new discoveries and data are publicized, but numerous are suppressed.
The 9,000 year-old Caucasian skeleton observed in Washington state crushes countless modern-day anthropological ideals. The Egyptian monuments and hieroglyphics found on South Pacific Islands deeply threaten quite a few current celebrated notions as do the discoveries of tops of pyramids and other ancient man-made edifices that rise up through the sea beds in the depths of some of the world's oceans. Quite a few of current science's cherished ideals are regularly trounced by overwhelming evidence of much more valid concepts. Remember the theory that the globe is flat or the theory how the sun revolves around the earth?
Unfortunately, there is a herd mentality formulated in any esteemed group as well as the general population usually places the "science authorities" on pedestals. If a researcher varies from the accepted philosophies (or those which are dictated to them indirectly by their funding sources), they risk getting an outcast; there's too significantly at stake to vary inside customary standards.
How do we "validate" the sciences of numerology, astrology and graphology? For the matter, how do we prove that unconditional love, intuition, or happiness exist? The inability to see the stars during the day doesn't mean they don't exist. We are unable to determine water evaporating, yet this does not disprove the cycle of evaporation and precipitation. 1 must view the sciences of numerology, astrology and graphology from an intuitive, unconventional perspective to begin to realize their inherent validity. Yes, newspaper horoscopes are like poetry--meant being amusing, and applying only a few numerological aspects towards personality analysis or prediction is like expecting to get in shape with a single minute of workout each week; a more thorough approach is necessary for results.
It sounds as if Dr Dudley may well believe he's contributed far more to the fields of math and science than Pythagoras. The beneficial philosopher Plato was strongly influenced by Pythagoras' doctrines, so it is doubtful Plato would have agreed with Dr Dudley. Pythagoras is known, among other things, for your hypotenuse theorem, or the Pythagorean Theorem. He's also known as the "father of number;" he established the scientific foundation for mathematics and also the philosophy of numbers.
Aside from excluding from his book virtually all valued comprehensive numerology techniques, Dr Dudley things out the superficiality of some current numerologists' methods. This might be justified simply because as well numerous published numerology books supply only a glimpse to the complex science and, or fail to put it inside very best context. However, numerology (otherwise known as range mysticism) is a type of mysticism and any person who has objectively studied the science comes to realize that events and personality traits are represented by numbers, not controlled by them.
Since his statements against numerology are so strong, 1 expects Dr Dudley to decisively invalidate the science. Yet, he fails to do this.
It's significant to note that hypothesis or theory can't be proven, it can only be invalidated. Graphology, numerology and astrology have in no way been scientifically shown to become invalid. Seasoned numerologists and astrologers consistently predict fated circumstances and accurately identify personality traits.
Although you will discover few or no documented cases of accredited researchers supporting the science of astrology or numerology, the field of graphology has been investigated by academic investigators (click and scroll down to your partial listing: [http://www.decadcorp.com/Graphology.html] ). In order for funds to be available to fund research in accredited institutions, a donor or corporation has to build a contribution. Do most benefactors indirectly or directly control and dictate what the dollars are employed for? Yes. In today's globe it is unlikely somebody or corporate donor will designate income for the numerology or astrology research; they are not areas that aid to directly cure disease or help the advertising of corporate promotional efforts.
Contrary to well-known opinion, traditional scientific theories are not unshakable. That that is discarded by the orthodox scientific community these days may incredibly well be embraced by the globe tomorrow. The history of science is full of widely held notions refuted by overlooked data. Established scientific standards and belief systems these days are always being challenged by new discoveries. Old paradigms are shattered, and exciting new platforms are established. Some of these new discoveries and data are publicized, but numerous are suppressed.
The 9,000 year-old Caucasian skeleton observed in Washington state crushes countless modern-day anthropological ideals. The Egyptian monuments and hieroglyphics found on South Pacific Islands deeply threaten quite a few current celebrated notions as do the discoveries of tops of pyramids and other ancient man-made edifices that rise up through the sea beds in the depths of some of the world's oceans. Quite a few of current science's cherished ideals are regularly trounced by overwhelming evidence of much more valid concepts. Remember the theory that the globe is flat or the theory how the sun revolves around the earth?
Unfortunately, there is a herd mentality formulated in any esteemed group as well as the general population usually places the "science authorities" on pedestals. If a researcher varies from the accepted philosophies (or those which are dictated to them indirectly by their funding sources), they risk getting an outcast; there's too significantly at stake to vary inside customary standards.
How do we "validate" the sciences of numerology, astrology and graphology? For the matter, how do we prove that unconditional love, intuition, or happiness exist? The inability to see the stars during the day doesn't mean they don't exist. We are unable to determine water evaporating, yet this does not disprove the cycle of evaporation and precipitation. 1 must view the sciences of numerology, astrology and graphology from an intuitive, unconventional perspective to begin to realize their inherent validity. Yes, newspaper horoscopes are like poetry--meant being amusing, and applying only a few numerological aspects towards personality analysis or prediction is like expecting to get in shape with a single minute of workout each week; a more thorough approach is necessary for results.
About the Author:
Astrology, Numerology & Handwriting Analysis - Far From Being Pseudo SciencesCheck Out astrology compatibility and libra woman libra man
No comments:
Post a Comment