If there were no restrictions in most economies, most people would suffer because of being exploited. That is why it is necessary to have guidelines in place to control how things are being done. You will find that some sources of income like fishing are being exploited by some people leaving others to suffer. The problem can be solved by enacting restrictions on fishing gear Dryden Ontario Canada. Below are some of the merits of the limitations.
The first benefit of these restrictions is that the fishermen who use traditional methods of fishing have been protected from those using sophisticated technology to catch fish. Most of the traditional fishermen use rods and nets that only catch the mature fish and are only capable of catching a small amount of fish. But if those using technology to fish can continue, the other fishermen will suffer.
The limitations are also meant to protect the endangered fish species. Most people who rely on this activity as a way of life know how to protect fish species and will use methods and fishing cogs that are friendly. However, in case the state fails to restrict the use of rods or nets that do not meet their standards, then, these species will become no more since they can no longer multiply.
Unemployment levels around the globe are high because of low job opportunities. If various governments do not come in to protect fisheries, then unemployment levels are going to rise. When states enact guidelines on methods to be used, fish species will be under no threat and those who rely on it to make a living will continue to do so. That way, redundancy levels will not increase.
Moreover, with restrictions, there can be the growth of the economy in the long run because of fishing. Most countries have no restrictions when it comes to the methods used to catch fish. Due to that, their sources are diminishing at a high rate such that after some years, the act will be no longer an economic activity. On the other hand, those enacting restriction preserve fish for the future which means people will continue to rely on it as an economic activity.
In a market, the sellers with more products dictate market prices. The same will apply in the fisheries industry, those using technology to fish harvest large amounts of fish and when they get to the market, even when they sell at a low cost they will not incur losses. Those who suffer most are the small-scale fishermen because they make losses. But with the government intervention, a surplus will not be available hence the prices for fish will be competitive.
Some gears when used to fish cause a lot of deaths even for the young fish. The government has come in to reduce these deaths by banning the use of some tackles of approaches of catching fish in certain places. When deaths are reduced, fish increase in numbers which means more income.
Finally, it is good to note that when conditions for harvesting fish are favorable, fish will continue to multiply, and more people will join the industry as either fishermen or traders. Consumers will access fish easily at low rates and exports will improve.
The first benefit of these restrictions is that the fishermen who use traditional methods of fishing have been protected from those using sophisticated technology to catch fish. Most of the traditional fishermen use rods and nets that only catch the mature fish and are only capable of catching a small amount of fish. But if those using technology to fish can continue, the other fishermen will suffer.
The limitations are also meant to protect the endangered fish species. Most people who rely on this activity as a way of life know how to protect fish species and will use methods and fishing cogs that are friendly. However, in case the state fails to restrict the use of rods or nets that do not meet their standards, then, these species will become no more since they can no longer multiply.
Unemployment levels around the globe are high because of low job opportunities. If various governments do not come in to protect fisheries, then unemployment levels are going to rise. When states enact guidelines on methods to be used, fish species will be under no threat and those who rely on it to make a living will continue to do so. That way, redundancy levels will not increase.
Moreover, with restrictions, there can be the growth of the economy in the long run because of fishing. Most countries have no restrictions when it comes to the methods used to catch fish. Due to that, their sources are diminishing at a high rate such that after some years, the act will be no longer an economic activity. On the other hand, those enacting restriction preserve fish for the future which means people will continue to rely on it as an economic activity.
In a market, the sellers with more products dictate market prices. The same will apply in the fisheries industry, those using technology to fish harvest large amounts of fish and when they get to the market, even when they sell at a low cost they will not incur losses. Those who suffer most are the small-scale fishermen because they make losses. But with the government intervention, a surplus will not be available hence the prices for fish will be competitive.
Some gears when used to fish cause a lot of deaths even for the young fish. The government has come in to reduce these deaths by banning the use of some tackles of approaches of catching fish in certain places. When deaths are reduced, fish increase in numbers which means more income.
Finally, it is good to note that when conditions for harvesting fish are favorable, fish will continue to multiply, and more people will join the industry as either fishermen or traders. Consumers will access fish easily at low rates and exports will improve.
About the Author:
If you are looking for information about fishing gear Dryden Ontario Canada residents can visit our web pages today. More details are available at http://www.kasportandtackle.ca now.
No comments:
Post a Comment